Maps

Ask an SME developer why a promising site slipped away (as we often do in passing conversations), and you will often hear the same answer: someone else had already tied it up. Not bought it. Tied it up. England's land market runs on two layers: the first is the title register, which tells you who owns a piece of land; the second, much harder to see, is responsible for the aforementioned tying up: the web of options, conditional contracts, pre-emption rights and promotion agreements that tells you who actually really controls the land supply in the UK. A housebuilder or land promoter can hold the future of a field for a decade without ever appearing as its owner. That second layer has been close to invisible for a long time; a cautious grantee might lodge a unilateral notice or restriction at HM Land Registry, but that typically reveals little more than the date, the parties and the land. It says nothing about how long the control lasts or when it can be exercised. That is about to change. Tomorrow, at the time of writing, marks exactly one year until the first reporting deadline under a new public register of contractual control agreements, and for the smaller end of the development market it could prove one of the decade's more consequential, and least discussed, reforms.

The Provision of Information (Contractual Control) (Registered Land) Regulations 2026 use powers first taken in the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023 to place a statutory duty on the grantee of a control right, typically the developer or promoter rather than the landowner, to report it to HM Land Registry through a regulated conveyancer. The scope for this is broad. It catches options, conditional sale contracts, pre-emptions and certain promotion agreements over registered land in England and Wales, where the right governs a transfer or a lease of 15 years or more, including part-title arrangements, and what gets reported is like throwing a distress flare into a deep, dark cave. Who, where, how and how long: the parties, the title numbers, the type of right, when it can be exercised and the period of control, including extension mechanics. Older agreements are not swept in wholesale, but they are captured the moment they are varied or assigned. These new teeth are real: non-compliance carries criminal sanctions, and the Land Registry may refuse to protect an unreported right with a notice or restriction.

So we get it: this isn’t the most interesting topic; why should our clients care? For the major housebuilders, the register is mainly a compliance exercise: audit the portfolio, update the precedents, diarise the triggers. For SME developers, it could be more like a new map, a way to level up against their bigger rivals.

Site-finding is where smaller firms are most disadvantaged, because they lack the land teams, strategic land budgets, and long-standing landowner relationships that let larger players lock up sites years ahead. Too often an SME spends months on a site, commissions surveys and opens talks, only to discover that an option was signed long ago with someone else. A searchable register changes that calculation in three ways: less wasted time; checking whether land is already under control becomes a desktop search rather than an awkward conversation; and visible expiry dates. Because the period of control and extension mechanics are reportable, you can see when control over a site is due to lapse. A site tied up today may be free in eighteen months, and the SME that spots it first is in a stronger position. Finally, a clearer picture of the market. For the first time, smaller developers, councils and lenders will be able to see roughly how much land in a given district is held under control, by whom, and for how long.

That last point carries a political edge. Debate about land banking has long been stuck because the evidence was patchy. A register does not settle the argument, but it replaces anecdote with data, which tends to sharpen policy. It would be easy to oversell this. Several limits are worth naming. First, timing. The public data is not expected until April 2028, so the practical benefit is at least eighteen months away. Second, financial terms are expressly excluded. You will see that a site is under option, but not the price, the premium or the promoter's share. Third, the exemptions are meaningful: control rights lasting less than 18 months in total, section 106 arrangements, overage and restrictive covenants all fall outside the regime.

There is also the risk of behavioural workarounds. Some commentators expect parts of the market to move away from options towards outright acquisition, or towards shorter agreements that sit below the threshold. Any transparency regime invites people to design around it. And a map is not a site. Knowing that land is free does nothing to fix planning delay, viability pressures or the cost of building. The register lowers one barrier to entry; the others remain.

For development lenders, the register is a useful new source for due diligence, not a new burden. Rights that are necessary or incidental to loan and security arrangements are exempt, so a lender's first legal charge is not itself reportable. What changes is the information available about everything around a deal. Before funding a site, a lender wants confidence that the borrower controls what they say they control, and that no third party holds a competing right. A searchable register adds a straightforward cross-check to the legal pack. It may also help assess an SME borrower's pipeline: a developer with several sites properly secured under reported agreements is easier to evaluate than one relying on handshakes. For investors in development lending, the takeaway is less direct but still relevant.

Anything that helps credible SME developers find viable sites faster, and helps lenders verify what they are funding, supports the kind of smaller-scale housing delivery that bank lending has increasingly left to others. As always, lending to property developers carries risk, including the risk of capital loss, and no register removes that.

The contractual control register will not make headlines in the way stamp duty or the Budget will. It is a quiet, technical reform. But it shifts power in a market where information has always belonged to whoever had the biggest land team. Developers signing options now are already inside the regime; the reporting deadline is a year away, and the data goes public in 2028. The SMEs and lenders who learn to read the new map early are likely to get the most from it.

Invest & Fund has returned over £389 million of capital and interest to lenders with zero losses, showing the rigour that governs our business. To take maximum advantage of this robust and exciting asset class, please visit www.investandfund.com

Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose money. This is a high-risk investment. You may not be able to access your money quickly, and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 minutes to learn more.