Taps

'Slavery, O Slavery! I cannot conceive'... In this week's blog, we examine a story that some voices in the media have misrepresented, transforming what could be one of several practical solutions to the significant labour shortage in UK home building into something slightly more sinister. We unpack how proposed and active prisoner reform schemes could benefit smaller UK homebuilders and alleviate some of the immediate issues our client market is facing when recruiting. Additionally, we review the long-term strategy, which may require revisiting difficult conversations, such as reintroducing immigration route reform back into the discourse.

As we know, there is a significant labour shortage in the UK homebuilding industry, which is hindering the sector's ability to meet housing targets. This shortage is driven by an ageing workforce, declining interest in trade professions among younger generations, and a lack of sufficient vocational training and apprenticeships, so it's no surprise that the government has had to look to fill the skills gap as best it can. One such step has been the recruiting of prisoners in Sussex to build homes across the county as part of a deterrent programme.

It's essential to look at the details in this story before rushing to judgment. From some of the reactions we have seen, one would think the plans have been modelled on a North Korean Shock Brigade or through the Hollywoodised reflective Aviator lens of the chain gang guard in the baking midday sun. Alas, in reality, it's less dramatic; inmates from HMP Ford prison are being offered a fantastic opportunity to reskill and undertake careers in the housing industry once their initial training and projects are completed, and time is served. With the initial wave targeting housing registers, key workers, and shelters, and 180 homes already completed, the scheme is a successful model that could theoretically be franchised nationwide and scaled to the point where we can bolster the number of participants in the trades on a long-term basis.

So what would be the perceived downside here? With any port from a public sector initiative to a private sector scheme, should that be a route considered, there is also the reputational damage to consider. If housebuilders, developers, or projects linked to the government are associated with any sort of unqualified labour, the public backlash could be severe. Consumers, housing associations, and councils may reject homes tainted by what the media would dub unethical labour practices. Major construction firms and investors may be unwilling to participate in projects that risk being seen as in any way exploitative or controversial; the focus would have to be aimed at the benefits, its a reform that would service dual purposes, but it would have to be done well, with thorough investment in the education and support provided.  

So, in the long term, that sounds great, but what about on a short-term basis?

It's not going to be the easiest of discussions with the macro backdrop, but one of the fastest ways to ease workforce shortages isn't this. We need to expand and streamline skilled immigration routes. Post-Brexit immigration restrictions have made it harder for UK builders to recruit skilled labour from the EU. The government could temporarily relax visa rules for key construction trades—such as bricklayers, plasterers, and carpenters—by expanding the Shortage Occupation List. This would enable companies to recruit workers more easily while training domestic talent in parallel.

At the same time, accelerating apprenticeship and vocational training programmes is essential. The UK construction sector has long suffered from a skills pipeline problem, partly due to the decline in technical education and a widespread misconception that construction jobs are of low status. The countries that don't suffer from this misconception don't face the issues we face, so the key battle for the government over the next decade will be convincing people that any skill, any ability to create something or offer something that someone else can't, is incredibly valuable, even more so as the demand for these practical skills increases via this deficit. The demand for academic-based skillsets will likely decrease in an ever-expanding A.I focused world and one of the significant unforeseen ramifications of mass automation through language models is that decades of valuing information over all else will gradually unravel. Information will be like water from a tap, and only then will the tap makers of the world unite. Those who create will be most valued, while the rest will merely participate.    

Quality and safety are also significant concerns. Building homes requires skilled, experienced workers who are adequately trained and motivated to produce high-quality work. Given the success of these schemes in Sussex, if they are to be rolled out nationally, specific considerations will need to be considered. Coercing people into construction roles without proper training or a genuine commitment to the job is likely to result in substandard housing, higher repair costs, and even serious safety risks for future occupants; skillsets that require years of training and dedication are not community payback roles, homes are long-term assets; cutting corners on their construction undermines trust in the entire industry.

However, for those who want to be involved, it could open doors to a new career in an exciting industry, bolstering the next generation of smaller homebuilders.

Invest & Fund has returned over £300 million of capital and interest to lenders with zero losses, showing the rigour that governs our business.

To take maximum advantage of this robust and exciting asset class, please visit www.investandfund.com.

Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose money. This is a high-risk investment. You may not be able to access your money quickly and are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 minutes to learn more.