In this week's blog, we jump straight in off the back of what the Independent Newspaper has dubbed a "major shake-up to house buying" and examine the latest series of Labour pledges that could have a direct and positive impact on supply-side transactions for our clients and developers. We often frame the value proposition in our asset class as our clients' ability to build homes, but in reality, it's about creating and selling homes, and that is where these positive changes come into play.
Labour now aims to speed up the buying process by around four weeks, reducing the average timeline of more than five months. They will attempt to achieve this as sellers and estate agents would be mandated to disclose upfront key property information (condition, leasehold/charges, waiting chains) to reduce “nasty surprises” and collapse risk. Binding contracts could be introduced earlier to prevent buyers from backing out late in the chain, in a move that could bring us closer in line with Scotland in terms of the market logistics, which may seem initially counterproductive in terms of adding costs to sellers, but in saving first time buyers a proposed average of £710 per transaction, it could ultimately increase volumes and confidence. The reforms would also introduce more precise regulation of estate agents and conveyancers (qualifications, code of conduct), and push digital ID / more online processes, ultimately either reforming or removing elements in the chain that either needlessly extract value or time.
So that being said, what kind of sector impact, if any, can we expect here?
Suppose Labour’s “binding contracts” and mandatory upfront disclosures prevent a large proportion of late-stage deal failures, which cuts a crucial source of delay and unpredictability. For a developer, especially an SME, this means a more reliable “exit pathway”, i.e., the risk that completed units will sit unsold or that buyers will renegotiate or exit is reduced. This reliability lowers the risk premium applied by lenders and equity investors across the market. Speaking in general terms here, a practice such as this could translate in time to better pricing on finance, lower contingency buffers, and sharper viability thresholds. Small-scale or marginal projects that were previously too risky become more manageable; they become opportunities in a more liquid market.
From a business perspective, and particularly for businesses whose success is predicated on transactions running smoothly, the goal would be to shorten the sales cycles and free up capital. This could reduce interest accrual on unsold stock, lower insurance costs, and financing overheads, and mitigate holding risk during market shifts. Lenders make money on the structure and management of finance in our sector, credit management and managing out complicated schemes is revenue-generating short-term, but ultimately, it's not the goal; the goal is to improve your clients' cash conversion cycle. You want your partners to sell the units they have built quickly and recycle capital into successive sites you continue to fund. The faster the units are sold, the sooner the proceeds can be used to fund new starts. When combined with capital from platforms like ours, these faster cycles mean that leverage can be more aggressively deployed without stretching liquidity. The client's goals and our goals are aligned, as they should be.
Mandatory and standardised disclosure of material information helps lenders, valuers, and insurers assess risk more effectively and uniformly. That lowers due diligence friction and pricing uncertainty. It permits more confident structuring of drawdowns and milestones. For SME developers, this mitigates the “black box” risk lenders often worry about when backing smaller players.
To put it all together: a healthy homebuying market is the demand engine that propels supply, and the Labour proposals represent a strong attempt to rewire the demand side. If enacted meaningfully, they reduce transaction risk, accelerate cycle times, and enhance buyer confidence, thereby directly improving the viability of any new development. For SME developers, who are particularly sensitive to friction and financing constraints, this matters more than for large volume players with deep capital cushions. Their growth depends on consistent absorption, quick turnover, and capital recycling. The financial models SMEs run are tighter: a slight misstep or delay can push margins into negative territory.
Hence, when demand side reforms align with supply and finance side innovations (you could say just like the Homes England and Invest & Fund alliance), it can unleash a lot of powerful sentiment, developers can more confidently commit to new sites, lenders can more comfortably extend debt to smaller operators, and capital is more efficiently deployed and recycled. In the broader public policy frame, it means that delivery targets aren’t met by just “scaling up” existing giants; they can be met by scaling out by enabling many small players to contribute. The Labour pledges raise expectations in this space and put more political momentum behind demand-side reform than has been seen in prior governments. If all that works, these reforms can be a genuine catalyst for unlocking latent supply, especially via SMEs supported by platforms like Invest & Fund.
Invest & Fund has returned over £200 million of capital and interest to lenders with zero losses, showing the rigour that governs our business.
To take maximum advantage of this robust and exciting asset class, please visit www.investandfund.com
Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose money. This is a high-risk investment. You may not be able to access your money quickly and are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 minutes to learn more.